I Do Not Fit Easily Into This World

I do not fit easily into this world. My family does not fit easily into this world.

I remember the first time I felt the sting of how uneasily my family would fit.

My wife and I had brought our daughter home from the adoption agency not three days earlier and we were scheduled for our first doctor’s appointment for her. My wife and I were both still off of work, so we went together, with our 1-month old daughter, to the appointment. After being called into the doctor’s office, we sat down and the nurse began filling out the computerized forms for our daughter. After asking for my name, she then asked for my wife’s name to add to the form. After a few seconds of typing, she looked at the screen, somewhat puzzled. “Hmmm,” she said. “The computer isn’t going to let me put more than one name in the box for mother. Well, one of you is going to have to be the father.”

This was the first moment that we felt the pain of not fitting easily into this world as a family. Though, some might argue that we actually felt it pretty strongly when we had to travel across the country in order to get married because we were not legally allowed to in our own home state at the time.

Then, a few weeks later, we were starting to look for a daycare facility for our daughter for when I went back to work. When we chose the place we loved the most, we were given a packet of forms to fill out. Page after page we had to cross out the word father and rewrite the word mother a second time.

Months later, we received our first, of many, gifts that was intended to be for Father’s Day. It had the word “father” crossed out and the word “mother” written in.

Months after that, we were sent our daughter’s reissued birth certificate (which is a practice I am greatly uncomfortable with in general) and not only had they erased the names of her birth parents, but there I was listed in the spot for “father.”

Years later, for the first time, of many, I heard my three year old daughter have to explain her family to a little boy on the playground before they ran off to play together because he had never heard of a family that didn’t have a dad before.

A year after that, we received our first flyer, of several, for a Daddy-Daughter dance and had to hide it quickly before our daughter saw the princesses splashed across the page and we had to tell her that we weren’t going to be going to this because it wasn’t made for families like ours.

This past year, for the first time, my daughter cried on Father’s Day as she realized that this entire holiday didn’t really fit with who we were. As we tried to celebrate her grandfather and the other men in her life, as we tried to convince her that we did really fit into this space in June, she remained unconvinced as she saw evidence just one more time of the ways we don’t fit easily into this world. And when I took to Facebook in order to simply say that I was thinking of all of those who did not fit comfortably into the Father’s Day holiday, I was told to stop making this day political and ruining a special day for all of those who do wish to simply celebrate fathers.

And over and over and over again, this world provides us with reminders that we are the “other,” that we are different, that we are not the target audience for so many of the events of this world.  And there is a particular sting, an extra hurt, when the moments that remind us that we are the other are created by the schools our children attend. Because then it is not just we, the adults, who do not feel as if these spaces are meant for us, but our children are made to feel as if the places where they spend the majority of their days are creating spaces and events that are not meant for them either. We do not have to seek these opportunities out in order to feel sadness about them, we are surrounded by them.

Our decision is not in whether we see them or not. Our decision lays only in whether or not we speak up about them. Every single time we are presented with another moment that reminds us of the heteronormative world that we live in, we have to decide if it is worth saying something. Because when we do, when we speak up, we know what we will face. We know that there will be those who hear our concerns and tell us that we are too emotional, that we are only thinking about ourselves, that this isn’t about us, that we should feel lucky with how much progress has been made, that this isn’t the right time, that acknowledging fathers does not mean that we are discounting mothers, that we shouldn’t hate men, that we ruining things for other people. We know there will be those who see us as angry lesbians, as men-haters, as those who want to lash out against traditional family structures and destroy any join that those traditional families have. We know that this is what we will face, because this is what we always have faced.

These are the things that run through our minds every time we decide to speak up. So it does not come easily. It is not a decision we make lightly. Because the truth is, we walk around every single day feeling as if the world does not fit us and we are desperate in our attempt to keep that feeling away from our children.

And let me be clear, I do not expect the world to conform to me and my family. Because that would mean it would be leaving out anyone who does not look like us. And that is the opposite of what I hope for this world. I would never ask that more people feel the alienation that families like mine so often feel.

So what do I expect? What is my hope when I do choose to push back and to speak up?

I want us to be more aware.

I want us to be more aware that the way we market things, the way we frame things, the language we use, the images we show, they all send a message about who has space here and who is welcome here. They also send a message about who does not have space here and who is not welcome here.  

I want us to be more aware that families do not look just one way. They never have. And that when we fall back on traditional assumptions that all families have a mom and a dad, then we are unintentionally leaving out anyone who does not fit that mold. And when the people feeling left out, are the same people who have already been made to feel left out of every other space they’ve encountered, then this can have harmful and dangerous effects.

I want us to be more aware that when we target activities to only one, narrowly-defined gender, making events just for moms or just for dads, especially when those events are made for parents and their children, then we are leaving children out who do not have that mom or dad or do not have that mom or dad available in that moment or who do not come from a family structure that matches the mom and dad mold in any way. It does not matter if we are doing this intentionally or not, the fact is that there is a child who is feeling as if this event is not meant for them.

And I am not asking that we never target events to certain groups of parents or certain groups of people. I am asking that we have a good reason for it when we do and that we make sure that we are being as inclusive as we can be.

If we are holding an event to help families who are recent immigrants go through forms that are not written in their native language, it certainly makes sense to target that event to those who might not have had time yet in this country to master the english language. That is a target group that makes sense because those who do not need the assistance would be taking away resources from those who do.

If we are running a support group for families who are experiencing a specific struggle, like sickness or death or the trauma of racism, then it makes sense to target the group to those families because they deserve a safe space to talk with others who understand what they are going through and having those present who do not understand the struggle might take away from the feeling of safety within the group.

But if we are having a dance. If we are having a dinner. If we are having an event where children are building things with adults. And if we are hoping to bring out family members to these various events, why do those family members have to be a certain gender? What does that distinction matter in this case? If we are trying to build strong adult support for children within a community, why would you ever want to limit that adult support by gender, especially when that understanding of gender is binary and limiting and leaves people feeling unseen? What benefit does that bring? If it doesn’t matter, if there is no reason to limit the focus, then why should? And if there is a reason, if it really does matter, then that is something to think about.

Because I know it is easy to read this and think, “Well, doesn’t that mean she thinks that we should not have programs that work to bring more girls, specifically, into STEM activities? Doesn’t that mean that she thinks that we should not have college scholarships specifically focused on black students?” And no. That is not what I am saying at all.

What I am saying is that we have to be thoughtful about these choices and look at those who have historically been KEPT OUT of opportunities because of systems and laws that were deliberately put into place in order to keep them out. When that is the case, then yes we have a responsibility to help groups of people who have traditionally been oppressed in order to overcome that oppression.  

But that is just not the case with a daddy-daughter dance. That is not the case with a BBQ targeted only to Dads. Those events are simply taking oppressive stereotypes and reinforcing them while also leaving out any family who does not have a dad as a part of it.

And I am also not suggesting, though some will think that I am, that we continue be okay with the fact that some dads feel as if they are not important in a school community. I would never ask that we ignore dads simply because not every family has them. What I am asking is that we stop and think more thoughtfully about why dads have traditionally not felt included in the school community.

There have been no laws stopping men from being a part of the school world. Instead, it is narrow thinking and dangerous stereotypes that have kept some men from being a part of the school community or feeling recognized by the school community. Thinking that causes us, as teachers, to immediately reach for mom’s phone number instead of dad’s. Thinking that causes us, as teachers, to email only mom, and not dad, when we have a question about home. And if this is the thinking that has made dads feel excluded (which, by the way, is only one narrow and privileged explanation for a lack of male adults who participate in school activities) then let’s change that thinking.

Let’s ask educators to engage in work that helps us to recognize and acknowledge our own biases and find ways to actively push ourselves beyond them.  Let’s ask educators to work to create truly inclusive school spaces and classrooms that do not reinforce narrow and harmful stereotypes about gender and families. Let’s work as educators to get to know our students and their families so that we can better reach out to all families and invite them into the work that we are doing, whether that invitation leads families further into our buildings or simply further into the lives of our students.

I believe that we can do all of this and that it can strengthen the communities we have in our building and the communities that our buildings are a part of. I believe we can do this by being more inclusive and not less inclusive. I believe we can do this by creating events and opportunities where all families and all family members feel welcome. And I believe that the only way to REALLY do that well, is to continue to listen when people share their own experiences and perspectives with us. This is how we build the empathy that is needed in order to build experiences that make everyone feel welcome, even when their experiences lay outside of our own.

So as for me, I will continue to share my experiences. I will continue to share what makes my family feel included and what makes us feel as if we don’t belong. And I will take whatever comes our way in the hopes that I can protect my own daughter, and other kids, from some of it. Because I believe that is how change happens and I have been lucky enough to see some tremendous changes that have happened simply because someone was brave enough to say, this isn’t working for me and others have been brave enough to listen and say, “I had no idea that this would make people feel included, let’s work together to think about how we can change it.” Because it is not that there are stories that are going untold, it is that they are being told and those in power are not stopping to hear them. And that is something that we all have the power to change.  

 

Advertisements

Supporting Claims With Evidence: Teaching Beyond the How

A few weeks ago, I wrote about the way that I frame our opinion writing work. We begin our study of opinion writing by examining the many purposes for writing about our opinions and we look at how we can use writing in order to demand the change that we want to see in the world. (If you would like to read more about that work, you can find it in THIS BLOG POST.)

Just like we spent time thinking about the different purposes for different types of opinion writing overall, I also wanted to engage my students in thinking about the different purposes for different types of evidence that they can use to support the reasons that they are making their claims through their writing.

Opinion writing centers around evidence. But too often, we tell our students to make sure that they support the claims that they are making with evidence without taking the time to look at the many different types of evidence that writers use in the world outside of school. Yes. Evidence can be quotes and statistics, but it can be more than that. It can be a child’s personal experience. It can be images that the writer creates using words. It can be so many things. In our quest to make sure that everything we do is “text” based, we have forgotten to teach our students that often the most passionate writing they will do, will come not from an article that they have read, but from experiences that they have lived through. Just look at the persuasive writing that is coming out of the young activists from Parkland, Florida. They are moving the country not just by quoting statistics, but they are sharing their personal experiences and using them to help convince this country that we need to change.

Another piece that I think we often miss as educators is that we forget that our job is NOT to tell each child what type of evidence that they need to use and when they need to use it, but rather we need to teach them a variety of types of evidence AND teach them when it might be best to use those different types of evidence so that they can make those choices for themselves. In this way, we can arm our students with a wide range of tools that they will have at their disposal when they are off and writing in this world and we can help them to decide when it is the best time to use each of those tools. We can provide them not with a formula that will limit them, but with possibilities that will empower them to craft the right type of writing at the moment when they most need it.

As I mentioned in my first blog post about our opinion writing this year, my students are writing a variety of types of opinion writing based on the changes that they are demanding and the audience that has the power to make those changes. Some students are writing persuasive blog posts to reach a large and public audience. Others are writing letters to school administrators. Others are writing letters to members of Congress.

No matter what type of writing they are doing, however, they will need to back-up what they are saying with evidence. So the majority of our time in this unit is spent examining what kinds of evidence they might be able to use in order to support a variety of claims. We do this by looking at our mentor texts. We do this by reading compelling texts and asking ourselves in what ways writers support what they are saying. Not only how do they do this, but also why do they select different types of evidence in different moments. Once we can understand that. We are better able to make those writing decisions ourselves.

And we begin with the evidence that is easiest to gather. The evidence that does not require my students to do any research beyond thinking about their own lived experiences and what they know from their own lives and the lives of those around them. When we are just beginning to learn the craft of opinion writing, I want them to know that their own life experiences are sometimes the most powerful ones to use to support their claims. When I sit down to write a blog post that I hope will change the minds of some of my readers, rarely do I begin by looking up quotes and statistics. Most often, I begin by thinking about my own experiences and how I can use those to help others see the need for change.

So that is where I ask my students to begin as well. Over the first few weeks of our unit, we look at a variety of mentor texts. I begin by using mentor texts that draw heavily from the experiences of the writers. CLICK HERE to see a document that shows many of the mentor texts that I use throughout our entire unit. (The quality is a bit poor since I attempted to convert the files into a GoogleDoc, but you can look up most of these online and find much better copies of them to use.)

With our first mentor texts, we simply practice figuring out what the overall claim of the piece of writing is. What does the writer want? What changes does the writer hope to see? We do this work as my students are starting to craft their own claim statements. I have shared it before, but THIS is the planning document that they use as they are doing this work.

After they have their first claim statements. We look back at our mentor texts and begin to list out the reasons that writers give to support the claims they are making. At this point, my students also begin to list out reasons that will support the claims they are making. I do not hand them a graphic organizer, but rather teach them to build an organizing tool that fits the needs of the writing that they hope to do. I wrote about this work last year in THIS BLOG POST.

And then it is time to start planning the evidence that they will use to support the reasons they will give in their writing. Instead of telling my students what evidence to use, we return, once again, to our mentor texts. We start to analyze how our writers are supporting what they are saying in their writing. The first things that my students start to notice go up onto our anchor charts. We look at how writers use personal experience, if/then statements, specific examples and details that create images in the minds of the reader. As we learn about these types of evidence, we highlight examples where we see them in our mentor texts.

And then. More importantly. We talk about why our writers chose these types of evidence in these specific moments. We look at how each type of evidence helps the writer in a different way. As we are doing this, we go back to our own plans and we look for ways that we might be able to use each type of evidence. Sometimes, my students are able to find ways to use these types of evidence in their own writing. Often, they find multiple places to each type of evidence. Other times, they don’t have a use for each type of evidence. And all of that is fine.

The idea is not to tell the kids how many pieces of evidence they need for each reason. They idea is to teach our students to think about the claims they are making and what types of evidence will be most useful.

Once we master using the kind of evidence that does not require any research, then we begin to look at the evidence that does require research. As we work to learn these new strategies, students look for places to start to add in these new strategies in their own writing. And the whole time. While we are doing this learning, we are also writing. That means that the first pieces that my students complete often are based on no formal research. Because we have not yet learned to use strategies that require research. And that is okay. I trust that as we learn more strategies, my students will start to use more strategies. And my conferring make sure that this is exactly what they are doing.

Every year, what I observe is that when we begin, the topics that my students chose to write about are personal. They mostly only affect them. They write about the stuff that they want or the changes they want at school that will make their own lives better. And every year I worry that we will not think more globally. And every year, my students prove me wrong. As we learn about how writers use more than their own lived experiences, my students begin to think beyond their own lived experiences. As we read about issues that affect the world beyond the writer, my students begin to think about the changes that they hope to see in the world beyond just themselves. So as my students learn new tools and strategies, they start to adapt what they are writing about in order to find opportunities to use those strategies.

As we learn, we add to our anchor charts which provide a visual reminder of all the things that we are learning to do as opinion writers. Here is how our charts looked as we neared the end of our unit:

IMG_4018IMG_5411IMG_5039IMG_1118

And every time I sit to confer with a writer, I notice all of the ways that they are supporting the claims that they are making. And what I notice every year is the wide variety of ways that my students use the strategies that we have learned together. Their writing never looks just one way because their writing is truly designed to fit their needs as writers.

And that is what always leads me to remember to ask my students to start to use their own pieces of writing as mentor texts to teach the rest of their classmates about what they have learned how to do. I will describe that work in my next blog post.

Rethinking Research — Part #1

I recently gave a presentation that I titled, “Revolutionary Reading: Reading To Change the World,” and in it, I talked about four of the bigger reading skills that I weave into my own reading instruction that aim to help kids not only to be better readers, but better human beings as well. One of the skills that I talked about was learning to base your beliefs on research. I wanted to share some of my thinking on how I have worked to rethink research in my classroom through the use of inquiry circles (as described by Stephanie Harvey and Harvey Daniels in their amazing book Comprehension and Collaboration) since it is the work that my students and I are currently engaged in.

I have written extensively about the work that we have done with our inquiry circles in past year and you can find those posts starting HERE and HERE. But this year, I have made some changes that were based on my desire to help my students to tie their own beliefs to the research that they have done and not simply to the things that they have been told by the adults around them. This year, I wanted to really hone in on the process that I wanted my students to walk away with that would allow them to learn about any current, complex social issues from multiple perspectives in order to reach their own beliefs.

As in past years, I began by introducing the idea of inquiry circles to my students and telling them that they would be selecting current, complex social issues to study from multiple perspectives with a group of students. The groups would be formed based around shared interests and our learning would focus on the comprehension strategy of synthesizing, while also walking through important skills that would allow them to responsibly use digital resources in order to research these issues. Our work would culminate in some form of written action that would work to create positive change in the world outside of our classroom. This is the anchor chart that I used in order to introduce this work to my students:

IMG_5554

In order to spark ideas for our inquiry circle groups, I shared with my students the following slideshow: Slideshow To Spark Ideas for Inquiry. As students worked through this slideshow on their own or with a partner, they brainstormed ideas that they had on THIS FORM. After brainstorming, we came together as a class and started to share some of the ideas that we had. These were the charts of ideas that we built:

And from there, we worked to narrow these topics down even more using THIS FORM. Once we came up with a smaller list by looking at the topics that more than one person was interested in studying, then the students wrote down their top three choices on a notecard. I took those notecards home and sorted them based on first choices. Then, I sat together with my students and we looked at the notecards all together and moved kids around until we had groups that everyone felt good about. By allowing the students’ choices to drive our topic selection and group formation, I was making it clear from the beginning that I was not attempting to teach my students WHAT to think, but rather I was teaching them HOW to think about these complex topics. The topic choices came from my students and their desire to know and NOT based on what I wanted my students to know or to think. This is an important idea that I wrote more about last year.

These charts show the topics and groups that we formed:

Once we had our topics and selected and our groups formed, that is when I really wanted to rethink the way that I had asked my students to research in the past. In the past, my research process with my students looked something like this: Research Process 1

I used to begin my asking students to craft a claim. A statement that expressed what they believed. And then, I sent my students out to find research that SUPPORTS that claim. And then, they used the evidence that they found in order to write about their claim and support it with evidence.

What I finally realized about this process is that I was asking my students to do the VERY thing that I believe has proved to be extremely problematic with the way adults learn about complex topics. Often, we seek out ONLY the research that supports the beliefs that we hold. It is this way of researching that often has us only getting our information from the sources who tend to agree with us. It is this way of researching that has led to the echo chambers that we currently exist is. And I was a part of perpetuating those problems. I was teaching my students to go out and IGNORE all of the research that did not agree with the beliefs that they held. In this way, I was teaching my students to ignore any opinions that did not match their own and I was robbing them of the chance of doing any research that might push their thinking and help them to more fully understand the complex issues that they were supposed to be studying.

So I needed to fix this problem. To do that, I needed to change the order in which I was asking my students to gather information and craft a claim. So now, my research process looks more like this: Research Process 2

Now, I ask my students to start their work by first identifying the opinions and biases that they ALREADY hold about a topic. I ask them to do this by using an updated version of the KWL. Instead of listing just what we know or what we think we know, I now ask my students to list the things that they have already heard about their topics that they think are probably true and then list the things that they have heard but that they are skeptical of. And then, I ask them to try to identify what biases they already hold. I model for them how I can take a topic like DACA and list out the opinions that I already hold that might influence the way that I seek out information. And then, finally, I look at those three columns and begin to craft questions that will help me to research this topic responsibly in order to better understand other perspectives, even when I do not think that I will agree with them. In this way, I am more likely to ask questions that can help me to learn about this topic from MULTIPLE perspectives. Then. And only then, can I begin to craft a claim that I will be able to support with the research that I have done.

This is the anchor chart that I used to introduce those ideas: IMG_5551

This is the revised KWL form that I asked my students to fill out before they began ANY research: Identifying prior knowledge, potential misconceptions, opinions and biases form. Here is a quick look at what that form looks like, but click the link to see the actual document. Revised KWL

After taking some time to fill out this form independently, then my students were finally read to meet with the rest of their inquiry circle group. The first time that they met with their groups, their task was simply to share what they had identified on their revised KWL forms and then to fill out THIS INTIAL MEETING document in order to let me know what they were interested in learning more about.

All of this work was what was done BEFORE they ever began their research. I wanted to give them the time to think about and talk about what they already thought they knew and believed. I wanted them to disagree with each other and question each other and notice what perspectives might exist, before they ever started seeking out information connected to their topics.

It is a step that I wish more adults took the time to do. It is a step that I think could save us from some of the problems that we find ourselves facing that have made it nearly impossible for us to have conversations about complex issues with people who think differently than we do.

Teachers often ask me what program I take my mini-lessons from. Teachers often ask me how I build my units. And I think what they are looking for is a list of lessons that I believe we need to teach our students. But the truth is that one of THE most important places that I look in order to guide my instruction is the world around us and the problems that exist within it. I look at the things that frustrate me about the world and I think about what I wish we were better able to do and THOSE are things that I try to teach to my students. And all the other stuff. All the other standards and skills and strategies, those are the things that I work in around these big ideas. What is it that I wish adults were better capable of doing? What are the things that are standing in the way of us doing better? These are the big ideas that I craft my units around.

Revolutionary Reading Units

And as I explained in the presentation that I gave (using the image above), I believe that we can use all the other things that we are required to teach as steps towards these bigger goals. And that is what makes me so grateful to be a teacher.

I will come back with more in later posts about the process that we use as we begin our research into these complex topics as we move from building an understanding of our topics to developing a stance about our topics and finally into action connected to our topics.

What I Do Not Want To Hear Anymore

Kids today are lazy.

Kids today are selfish.

Kids today are apathetic.

Kids today spend too much time in front of their screens.

Kids today are spoiled.

Kids today have no respect for authority.

I am done with all of that. I am sick of hearing it. I will actively block those who share articles on Facebook that point to one of those statements as truth.

Because look at what kids today are doing. Look at how they are standing up and speaking out. Look at how they are leading us. Look at how they are picking up the slack for the things that we have ignored.

Young people were on the front lines as the Black Lives Matter movement began. Young people were on the front lines when public schools in their neighborhoods were being closed. And now young people are, once again, on the front lines after surviving a school shooting and demanding that this country finally gets serious about stricter gun control laws.

In many ways, we, as teachers and parents, have failed these kids. But it is NOT because we have been too permissive, it is NOT because we have allowed them to have a voice and a say in the way that they are treated by adults, it is NOT because we have allowed them to use social media to share their voices with the world, it is NOT because we have not said NO often enough, it is NOT because we have taught them to question what they are told and the rules that they are expected to follow and it is NOT because of the time we have allowed them to use technology to connect with others.

These are so often the reasons that are given for how we are failing this generation of young people. We as teachers and we as parents. We have helped them to find their voices and we have helped them to find ways to share those voices with the world. And while so many are busy criticizing today’s youth and today’s schools and today’s parents for being lazy and too screen-obsessed, we have been actually failing our children in so many other ways.

We have been failing our children by allowing our schools to turn into testing factories that narrow our curriculum and teach our children that they are to be judged only by their ability to choose the answer that was deemed to be correct by a person who has never met them or heard what they really know about the world.

We have been failing our children by allowing so many of them to remain invisible in our schools while we have continued to privilege just one kind of voice and one kind of story so that too many of our children do not recognize their own value or worth in this world.

We have been failing our children by staying silent on topics that make us uncomfortable or make us feel uncertain about what we know so that our children have no models of how to have difficult conversations and are left to figure that out for themselves.

We have been failing our children by denying them stories that would allow them to build empathy for others who exist in this world because the stories make us nervous that they will ask questions that we are uncertain of how to answer.

We have been failing our children by BLOCKING the internet and social media and technology from them instead of TEACHING them how to use these tools responsibly so that they can do good in this world and balance their use of technology better than we, as adults, have done.

We have been failing our children by allowing our schools to become overly reliant on systems that reward compliance and take away a student’s right to ask questions about what they are being asked to do and why.

We have been failing our children by allowing government officials who care more about money and power than they do about the safety and security of our youngest citizens to be elected into office because it might give us a better income tax rate.

We have been failing our children by allowing people into office who do not want to ensure that all children are given access to adequate health care so that their physical AND emotional selves are kept well.

We have been failing our children by allowing them to be exposed to hateful words and untruths about who they are where they have come from without loudly proclaiming in public spaces how wrong these words are and that any single child’s worth and humanity and right to exist in this world and this country will NOT be up for debate in our classrooms.

In all of these ways, and in so many more, we have been failing our students and yet I keep reading articles and I keep reading statements about how the real problem is that we are giving kids too much screen time and we are not saying no often enough. Do I believe that these, too, can become problems? Yes. Of course I do. But do I believe that they are the biggest problems that we, adults, are causing for our children. Not at all.

Because look at the many ways we, as adults, are failing our children and look at what these amazing young people are managing to do in spite of all that. And I have to believe that in some small way, part of the reason that they are able to stand up and speak out and fight back is because somewhere along the way, they have learned how.

They have learned how because someone showed them how to use those screens to do good in this world. They have learned how because someone helped them to believe that there is value in being critical of what you are being asked to do and what you are being told as truth. They have learned how because someone suggested to them that there is value on pushing back against authority and showed them ways to do that so that they will be heard.

So let’s stop talking about giving teachers guns. Let’s stop talking about how we are ruining our children with screens. And let’s start following where our students are leading us and help them to do better for this world.

Be The Change: Refocusing our opinion writing

One of the greatest changes that I have made in my own fifth grade classroom came when I stopped looking at writing as a skill that I needed to teach my students and instead refocused on writing as a tool to empower my students. For example, instead of simply teaching students how to write good stories from their own lives, I began to look for ways that I could empower students to use writing as a way to show the world who they are by the stories that they choose to tell to the world. The shift not only raised the level of engagement, but it also helped my students to see real purpose in their writing and to better master the writing skills being taught because they were more eager to incorporate these skills into the meaningful and purposeful work that they were doing through their own writing.

And so, when we began our opinion writing unit a few weeks ago, I knew that I needed to begin by helping my students to see opinion writing as a tool that empowered them to fight for the changes that they wanted to see in the world. Too often, students talk about opinion writing in a way that feels completely detached from their own lives. They speak of the prompts that they have been assigned, the positions that they have been forced to take and defend, the articles that they were told to read that became the basis of a piece of writing centering an opinion that did not originate from any lived experience, but rather from a teacher’s need to collect evidence, in a standardized fashion, of the writing skills that a child possessed.  In an attempt to “level the playing field” and “give every child the same background knowledge” about a topic, we have removed all evidence of the passion that can exist behind a piece of opinion writing. And thus, our students are left with only the belief that writing is something you do because it is an assignment and not because you care deeply enough that you are compelled to write in order to demand a change.

And that is what I wanted to help my students to rediscover. The passion behind their writing. The act of writing because you have something that you are compelled to say. The process of writing in order to have your voice heard about an issue that you feel deeply about. And here is the thing. Who am I to decide what issues students will feel passionately about? And how will that help them in the world beyond our classroom?

So as we began to dig into our work as writer of opinions, I decided to begin in a place that is worthy of our time: the change that we want to see in our world.  Because these kids are FILLED with ideas and wishes about what they would like to change. These kids are filled with passionate opinions. And yet, why is it that when faced with the task of writing their own opinions, they are quick to say, “I have nothing to write about.” I think that it is mostly our fault. We have made them feel as if their opinions are not worthy of writing about. We have made them feel as if the only opinions that will make great writing topics are the ones that are assigned by a teacher or the ones that are based on an article that they have been given to read. These beings that are filled to the brim with passionate opinions have been made to feel as if those opinions are the kinds of opinions that they should write about.

So I wanted to begin by helping them to rediscover all of the changes that they want to see in their own world and in our greater world and then use those desires for change to motivate them to write.

As with most other forms of writing, the best way I knew how to help students to see the purpose of writing was to bring in mentor texts that showed the many purposes for writing beyond the walls of a classroom. So our unit began with time for exploration. I put together file folders filled with examples of writing that was motivated by a desire to see a change occur in the world. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS THE DIFFERENT PIECES OF WRITING THAT EACH GROUP WAS GIVEN. For several days, students worked together in groups to analyze these pieces of writing. HERE IS THE DOCUMENT THEY USED TO THINK ABOUT THE PIECES OF WRITING. 

And then after a few days of seeing how writing can be used to ask for change, we then started to think about the changes that WE would like to see in our worlds. And I asked them to think about their worlds in three different ways. I asked them to think about their lives at home, their lives at school and also the world beyond their own lives at home and at school. Because here is the thing. Yes. I want all students to learn to write in order to demand change in big ways. To demand the kind of change that makes our world a better place. But just because that is what I want, it does not mean that it is what they are all ready for. Ultimately, I want my students to know that their voices deserve to be heard and that one way that they can be heard is through writing. However, some of my students will need to learn that first by writing about topics that are close to home. And then they can work their way up to writing about more global topics.

So I give them that choice.

I know that by the end of our unit, all students will have experience writing about complex social issues, because this writing unit will eventually merge with the inquiry circle work that we are doing. (You can read about last year’s inquiry circle work starting in THIS BLOG POST). So, for now, I want to give each child a chance to experience what it feels like to really write about something that is truly meaningful to them. Even if that means that a handful of students are writing to their parents to ask for a new puppy. If that feels meaningful, then I want them to experience that. And truth be told, last year SEVERAL new puppies were added to several families because of their children’s opinion writing.  No joke. Talk about seeing the power of your writing.

So, when it is time to start brainstorming, THIS IS THE FORM that I model using and then ask my students to use. And I give my students lots of time to just talk about the changes that they would like to see at home, at school and in the world beyond home and school. And, my goodness, can you hear their passions come to life. Rarely do the writing discussions in my classroom feel as energized as when I allowed my students space to talk about the things that they would like to see changed in the world.

And once that passion was released, then we simply had to channel it into good writing. And that is what we would work on next.  I will be back soon to write about our next steps of this work.

 

2017: A Year in Blog Posts

It is dizzying to look back on this past year. Truly. When I reach back to this time last year, it feels so far away. In so many ways this past calendar year has exhausted me and in so many other ways it has energized me. These are the moments I am most grateful for this little blog. Because within the confines of my tiny corner of the internet, I have stored a year’s worth of emotion and reflection and good, good work done by children.

So for this last blog post of the year, I simply want to gather here the most read blog posts from this past year. I have reread each one as I rediscovered it and I have been moved by all that they hold. So here we go. A year in blog posts:

#10: Stories as Mirrors and Windows Part 2: Stories as Windows and Inquiry at the Start of the Year

This post describes how we used our memoir unit in order to learn how to learn from the stories that other people tell. And, more importantly, how the unjust systems of power that we are a part of allow some stories to be heard more than others and how, as readers, we can work to fix this by seeking out and amplifying those stories that have, too often, gone unheard.

#9: Turning Our Learning Into Action: Inquiry Circles Week’s #8, 9 and 10

This post details the final weeks of our inquiry circle work during our last school year. At the end of this long post is the story of one of my all time very favorite moments of teaching.

#8: Inquiry Fights Against the Notion That Kids are Not Ready to Tackle Tough Issues and Difficult Conversations: Inquiry Circles Week #1 

This post actually describes the work that we did at this time last school year when students chose topics for their inquiry circle work. The post describes one of my strongest beliefs that inquiry allows us to dig deep into tough issues without the fear of others saying we are pushing our political  beliefs on our students.

#7: Stories as Mirrors and Windows Part 1: Stories as Mirrors

This post describes our work with the idea of stories as mirrors and windows and a description of how Dr. Rudine Sims Bishops’s work informed the work we do in class. The end of the post describes how my students looked through our own classroom library in order to find books that allowed them to see themselves reflected in some way. It also laid the groundwork for our discussions on how some groups of people have traditionally had a much easier time seeing themselves reflected in the books they read than other groups.

#6: Storytellers Presentation From NCTE

This post includes the text from my section of the amazing NCTE session I was lucky enough to be a part of. It was an absolute highlight of my professional life.

#5: Turning Misinformation, Misunderstandings and Misconceptions Into Questions That Drive Inquiry: Inquiry Circles Weeks #2 and 3 

This post describes the work we did last school year in order to learn how to combat biased news and our own limited understanding of tough topics by turning what we think we know into questions that drive us to seek out more information.

#4: We Are Only One Tile in The Entire Mosaic of a Child’s Education 

This post describes my own struggles to feel as if I am “enough” as a teacher and the way I was able to reconcile my feelings of inadequacy last year.

#3: Teaching Our Students That What We Read Affects The Biases and Stereotypes We Hold 

This post describes the work we did last school year as we analyzed texts in order to see how they had the power to either reinforce or push us beyond the biases and stereotypes we hold about people in this world.

#2: Helping Students Confront and Examine Their Own Biases Using the Images on the Covers of Picture Books 

This post describes how we used the images on the covers of picture books in order to reveal our own biases so that we could begin to confront them, understand how they were formed and then work to break them down.

#1: How Am I Supposed to Confront White Supremacy and Racism on the First Day of School

This post was written just days before the start of this current school year and in many ways it still carries the tone of the school year thus far. Rereading it reminded me of the important work we do every day.

And one that did not make the cut of being one of the most read posts, but the one I think is most important for me to carry into this coming year…

We Work in The Service Of Children 

And there you go. A year in blog posts. This year has been tough and exhausting and, at times, it has been difficult to remain hopeful. But in many ways, this year only served to show us all what we always have been here in this country. And now that we are clearer about who we are and who we have been, we are better able to rise up and fight to turn ourselves into a better version of all of that. So it is with eager anticipation that I walk into the year 2018. I am ready to join hands with my students, lock arms with fellow educators, and work to make this world a better place.

We Work in the Service of Children

A warning: this post will be a mess. Because my thoughts are a mess. Because sometimes when anger and frustration take over, my words just need to come out and I cannot worry about their coherence. And so, here we go.

We work in the service of children.

We do not work in the interest of preserving the comfort of adults.

This past year, over and over again, I have heard story after story about teachers who have been told to wait. I join those teachers, as I have been told to wait as well. When we push to confront issues of equity or push to make our classrooms more inclusive or demand that others work to make their classrooms more inclusive or work to bring out difficult conversations that we know will move us forward towards teaching in more just spaces and in more just ways, we have been told to wait.

Wait for board policies to be written.

Wait for parents to be on board.

Wait for a committee to form.

Wait for that committee to craft a vision statement.

Wait for us to let the parents know what we plan to do.

Wait to ask for permission from adults.

Wait.

And every time I have been told to wait, and every time I hear the stories of others who have been told to wait, I question what it is we are really waiting for.

And then, quickly, I realize the answer. We are waiting for adults to be ready. We are waiting for adults to be comfortable.

But we know how that story goes. Adults, at least those whose comfort we are so worried about protecting, those adults will never be ready. It will never be the right time. It will never be the right moment. Because the truth is that we have missed the right moment. We have missed the right time. We are now so far past when we should have been doing this work that we have absolutely no right to wait any longer.

Because what happens to our children while we wait?

As our schools continue to operate as oppressive systems where not all children feel safe, where not all children feel valued, where not all children have equal access to the learning that we are trying to do. As we continue to perpetuate these systems, what happens to our children?

I’ll tell you what happens. Children continue to suffer. They continue to feel as if they have to hide a piece of who they are in order to make the adults around them more comfortable. They continue to feel as if who they are is not appropriate for the classroom, that it should come with some kind of a permission slip, that other children need parent permission before they know that people like them exist. They continue to be denied the opportunity to see people just like them reflected in the books that they read and the curriculum they are taught. They continue to be forced into boxes that do not feel as if they were ever made to fit them. They continue to have to make choices between options that only make them feel worse. They continue to feel as if it is their job to make those around them comfortable, even if that means denying their own identity and stuffing the very best pieces of themselves far down inside.

And not only that. It is not only the children whose identities are not valued by our educational system who are suffering. Those who are a part of the groups privileged enough to have always been seen by our schools, they are suffering too. They are being denied a chance to learn about the people who exist in this world and it leaves them ill-equipped to interact with those people with compassion and empathy. And so they are turning out to be cruel. They are being denied a chance to learn about the inequity and imbalance of power that has existed in this country since its inception so that they are left with no knowledge of the systems that have given them privilege and they are left with feelings of entitlement and an inability to work to fix the systems they are a part of. They are suffering too.

And our world. Our whole is suffering while we wait for the adults to feel ready. While we wait to make certain adults more comfortable.

And in the mean time. Children continue to take their own lives because they do not feel seen by our world.  Children continue to leave our school systems and are left to fend for themselves in this world. Children continue to rail against the systems that oppress them and end up in jail because of it. Why does that all of that make people feel comfortable? Why are we okay with that? Why does that not send us running towards change?

It is the fear. I understand that. We fear that parents won’t understand what we are doing. We fear that administrators won’t support us. We fear that families will complain.

But we have been here before. We know how to move forward in spite of the fear that parents won’t understand. In a million different ways we have moved forward before.

In small ways. Yes. But in ways that can teach us something about the path forward.

Think about something as small as inventive spelling. When our schools began to support the use of a child’s inventive spelling, we saw the power of that decision. We saw that it opened up the world of writing for children. We saw that they wrote more, that they developed stronger writing identities, that they moved along the developmental path of writing much more quickly when they were not held back by the spelling. We saw the power of that work and so we moved forward into it before many of the adults around us were ready. And parents were terrified. They imagined that their children would never learn how to spell. There were phone calls and meetings and conferences. And there was confusion and questions and anger.

And yet. We moved forward because we knew it was right. We moved forward because we saw what this work could do for our children. We did not wait for all of the adults to be ready.  Because we knew that this was good for kids.

And I know that this work is much scarier than that.

But, in the same ways, with perhaps a bit more bravery, we can move forward with this work too. With the work of creating more inclusive classrooms. With the work of helping students see the racist and homophobic and transphobic and Islamaphobic systems that they are a part of. We can move forward. Because we know that it is good for our children. We know that it is good for this world. We have seen the power of this work and we can move forward and trust that we can help the adults around us to see the power of this work as well, even before they think they are ready.

We can tell them about the power of this work. We can tell them the evidence we have seen. We can tell them that we have seen children able to learn more successfully when who they are is acknowledged in our schools and in our classrooms. We can tell them about how we have seen children wrestle with tough topics and end up in places of compassion and empathy. We can tell them that introducing our students to characters of all kinds in books gives them an opportunity to learn to ask questions respectfully so that they are more prepared to respectfully encounter people of all kinds in this world. We can tell them how they have learned to disagree respectfully. We can tell them how they have learned to identify bias and work to move beyond it. We can tell them how they have learned to question what they read. We can tell them how they have learned to ask whose voices are not being heard and then work to seek those voices out. We can tell them about the communities that we are able to build and sustain. About the work that we are able to help our students do.

We can make them believe that they are ready by showing them that their children have always been ready.

We do not have to wait until the adults arrive at comfort. We can meet them where they are, in their state of discomfort, and we can guide them forward by letting the students and their work lead the way.

Because I am sick of waiting. I am sick of others being okay with waiting. We have waited for far too long. So long, that this past week, I had to watch as my own government heard arguments about whether people like me deserve the right to be served by businesses and business owners who claim that their religion prevents them from accepting that I am a human being worthy of service. And as I have watched that story unfold, again, our children are watching it unfold as well. And if that is the only story they are hearing, if that kind of hatred is not tempered in our schools by stories of acceptance and inclusion and positive representation, then we can no longer act surprised when hatred wins the white house. We can no longer claim we don’t know how this could have happened. Us. Us and our waiting is how this has happened.

And if we wait until everyone is ready for change. Then change is never going to come.

Storytellers Presentations from NCTE

This past weekend, I had the absolute pleasure of attending NCTE in St. Louis. I also had the absolute honor of being a part of a powerful presentation with incredible humans. Each one of us shared our personal story and then shared how we have been able to connect that personal story to our work as educators in order to do better for our students and for our teaching.

What our presentation reminded me is that there is such power in sharing our voices and our stories and our selves. Our whole selves. And I have not been doing a very good job of that on this blog this year. I have continued to share my work in my classroom, but I have quieted my voice as a gay educator. I suppose there have been many reasons. Perhaps because the world feels less safe. Perhaps because my own school has felt less safe. Perhaps just because I have been tired.

But this weekend reminded me of the power of sharing my voice. It reminded me that sharing our own stories not only helps others and helps our students, but sharing our own stories also helps us.  To grow. To live fully. To be whole in this world.

So with that in mind, here is the story that I shared on Sunday…

I want to tell you a story.

This story takes place in 2012.

Slide 1

This story is about my wife, Carla, and I on our honeymoon in California. On the last night of our honeymoon, we checked into a bed and breakfast in Half Moon Bay, about 30 minutes outside of San Francisco. The next morning, we headed downstairs for breakfast and we saw two other people already standing in the dining room waiting to eat. After a moment, the woman walked over and said good morning and introduced herself and her husband.

I responded with a smile and then she looked at Carla and looked back at me and I will never forget the words that she uttered. “So”, she said, “are you traveling just you and your son?” There was a moment or two of silence as I tried to figure out what she could possibly mean. There were no children anywhere in the room. In fact, there were no other people in the room, at all, besides this woman and her husband and Carla and me. And with all that information in mind, it finally started to dawn on me. She thought Carla was my son.  

How could this be? I wondered. How could she look at my wife and I and reasonably jump to the conclusion that we were mother and son? It didn’t make any sense to me.

Somehow. The moment passed. We moved on. But the moment didn’t really pass. It stuck with me for months. And for months I wondered how it could have happened. Until one day, I found myself again thinking about that moment and I suddenly remembered something I had learned back in undergrad. I remembered what the famous child psychologist, Jean Piaget, had to say about the way children acquire new language and understand new concepts.  

Slide 2

What he found was that when children encounter something new, they try to match it with something that they already know. Piaget called the things that we already know, our schema.  When children are not able to find something in their schema that matches the new thing they are encountering, they may try to match it with something that is close. This is called assimilation.  So, for example, when a child sees a cow for the first time, she might not know the word and may try to match that new thing (in this case the cow) with something in her schema that is close. Something else that might be large, have four legs, and a tail. She might refer to this new thing as a horse because it is the closest thing that she has in her schema to a cow.

Now at this point in the story, it might sound like I am trying to equate my wife and I to horses and cows, but I am not.  

What I do think, however, is that Piaget’s theories help to explain how this woman could have gotten my wife and I so very wrong.

I believe that when she saw us, she knew, somehow we were family. Maybe it was the way we stood or the way we spoke or the way we looked at each other. But the kind of family that we were, didn’t match any of the schemas she carried with her about family. We didn’t look like any of the images of family that she had ever been exposed to and had stored in her mind. So she tried, without realizing it, to match us to the closest schema that she could find. And the closest thing that she could come up with was mother and son.  

Perhaps, this woman, who probably meant no ill intent, had such a narrow understanding of family and we just did not fit into it.  So in a desperate attempt to match us to what she already knew, she ended up erasing who we really were. And she tried to shove us into her existing schema so that she felt comfortable, so that she experienced what Piaget referred to as equilibrium.

And then I also thought about all that Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie told us in her brilliant TED talk, “The Danger of a Single Story,” about how we are limited by the single stories that we are told about entire groups of people and about how we broaden our understanding of the world by broadening the range of the stories that we are exposed to.

And that led me to wonder. What would have happened if this same woman, maybe when she was a child in somebody’s classroom somewhere, had been shown a wider variety of images of what family meant? What if she had heard a wider variety of stories that helped her to understand the many ways that people could be a family? If she had carried a wider variety of images around with her in her schema would she have had an easier time seeing us for who we really were?

And if this wider variety of stories would have made a difference in how she interacted with us is it possible that a wider variety of stories can also make a difference in the way our own students go out into this world and interact with other humans?

I believe the answer to this is yes. I believe that it is not only possible, but that it is necessary for us, as teachers, to change the way our students interact with other humans by bringing a wide variety of stories about a wide variety of people into our classrooms. I believe that it is necessary that our students grow up knowing so many more stories than this one woman knew. And not just about gay people or about family. They need to hear a variety of stories about all of the people that we share this world with.

Because if there is any hope for this world, it lies in the hands of our students. And we need to arm them with the stories that will fight against the stereotyped messages that they are surrounded by. We need to arm them with the stories told by the people themselves who are living them.  So let’s bring them more stories.

More stories about people who are Native.

Slide 3

More stories about people with disabilities.

Slide 4

More stories of people who are Muslim.

Slide 5

More stories of people who are Black.  

Slide 6

And if we can do this. If we can bring in more stories and if we can create wider definitions of who people and groups of people are then our students will have such a variety of images stored in their minds and in their understandings that they will no longer be able to meet a human being and see them as only just one thing. They will no longer need to erase the person standing in front of them in order to shove that person into the narrow definitions that they carry inside. Instead, they will have to look at the human standing in front of them and see them, simply, for who they are.  

And that is the kind of world that I want my own kid to grow up in. Because that is how this story ends.

Slide 7

Now my family looks like this.  Now our daughter, Millie, is at the very center of our story. And every day I try desperately to make this world a better place so that she doesn’t have to grow up in a world where people carry narrow definitions of family that do not have space for her or for us.

It is the reason why every year, I come out all over again to a new group of students as I show them pictures of my wife and my daughter on the very first day of school. Every year, I still get nervous. Every year, I still wait for the phone to ring and for a parent to complain. But every year, I share my story with my students because that is just one more story for them to know. That is just one more step in fixing this very broken world that we are living in.  

Stories as Mirrors and Windows: Part 3 — Pushing Beyond the Single Story Told

Before I even start this post, let me just stop and give thanks to the work of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Her TED talk, “The Danger of a Single Story,” provided a pivotal turning point for me as an educator and as a human and continues to act as such for my students each year.  All of the work that is described here was inspired by her work and her words and her wisdom. I know that as of late, there have been problematic comments made by Adichie towards the transgender community. I struggle with those comments. I disagree with them and I am still wrestling with how to make peace with that (as a side note, I found THIS ARTICLE really helpful in coming to terms with it all).

For now, I continue to be inspired by her words and remain in awe of the affect they have on my fifth grade students.

As I wrote in my LAST BLOG POST, we have been studying at how we can learn from the stories that other people tell. We have been learning how to listen to the stories of other and use those stories to spark questions that we can seek answers to in order to gain a better and deeper understanding about the world around us. We first did this work with the picture book Stepping Stones which led us into a three week guided inquiry on Syrian refugees.

Since we had grown a much deeper understanding of Syrian refugees, I wanted to build on that work and show my students that understanding one refugee, from one country, still only gives us an extremely limited and narrow glimpse into the lives of refugees overall.

So I brought back out the story Stepping Stones and then also brought out the picture book Two White RabbitsTwo White Rabbits tells the story of a father and daughter who are leaving, what we are lead to believe, Mexico or a country in Central America and are traveling north towards the United States. The author’s note gives additional information on refugees from this area.

After reading this book to my students, I introduced them to the phrase, “The danger of a single story.” I told them that these words were not mine, but words that we would work to understand over the next few days. I asked them to think about what those words might mean and how our knowledge of Syrian refugees might actually be problematic as we attempt to understand refugees from another part of the world.  Here are the charts that we made that tracked the brilliant thinking that my students shared:

The next day, we watched parts of the Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s TED talk, ‘The Danger of a Single Story.” Whenever we watch TED talks in class, I always print out the transcript so that we can go back into the text later as we discuss the speech. HERE IS THE MODIFIED transcript that I handed to my students. It only includes the sections that we watched.

After watching the TED talk, which my students absolutely loved and were fascinated by, we went back to our charts and talked further about what we understood the danger of a single story to be and mean.  Again, their comments were inspiring and hopeful and showed a real growth in their thinking.

After talking about the idea of single stories, it was time to take a look at some actual examples.  So we began by taking a closer look at the single story often told about Native American people. I wanted to first give students a visual to represent the single story that is often told about an entire group of people. So we began with a Google image search. Several years ago, I was introduced to the idea of using Google image searches in order to reveal misconceptions and biases that are often associated with terms that we search. In many ways, these image searches can reveal to us the single stories that our society holds of a variety of people and places. So I typed Native Americans into our Google image search and displayed the results for my students to look at.

IMG_3054

As they viewed the results, I asked them to use THIS FORM in order to write down what they noticed as they looked at this representation of the single story often told about Native people.  I then asked them to share their observations. Some of the observations that my students made were that almost every image looked like it was from a long time ago, the clothing they saw looked very different from the clothing that they see around them today, they noticed the presence of feathers and headdresses in almost every image, they noticed that all of the images included people who looked sad or serious and they also noticed that many of the images included weapons.

After talking a bit about how these images revealed a single story, I shared that we could use questions in order to push ourselves to think more deeply about what we are seeing and, more importantly, what we might NOT be seeing. We have been working on asking better questions and understanding the different purposes of questions, so this idea fit in with the work we had been doing as readers. We looked at how questions can help us to uncover stories we might not see or hear otherwise. We then looked at the kinds of questions that might help us to push beyond the single stories we are presented with:

After thinking about these ideas, I asked my students to go back to their notes and think of some questions we could ask that might help us to push beyond this single story. Again, we took time to share their questions. This was one of those moments, when I had to stop myself from visibly cringing. Because some of their questions, they revealed what a terrible job our school system has done teaching these kids about the people they share this world with. But these questions, they were also a sign of how brave and willing these kids were to learn more and realize how much they did not know. Some of their questions were hard to hear. Questions such as, “Do Native American people still exist today?” and “Did Native American people live anywhere else other than in teepees?” and “How has our country treated Native American people in the past?” Again, the questions are hard to hear. And NOT because there is anything at all that these incredible kids were doing wrong, but rather because they reveal our own failures as adults and as a society.

So I listened to their questions and I thanked them so much for asking them and I told them that in the next few days, we would look at additional resources in order to try to help us to answer some of these questions and grow our understanding.

The next day, we came together again and I asked my students to pull back out the notes they took yesterday and to look them over once again. We thought back to the single image that we saw reflected in the images we saw yesterday and then we began to think about who was telling the story in those images. I suggested that many of those images were images that were telling the story of Native Americans by people who were outside of that group of people. The images told a story ABOUT Native Americans and not necessarily BY Native Americans.

I asked my students to think about how kids were describe themselves and how a group of adults might describe kids. I asked them to think about which might be more accurate, which might be more positive and which might carry more of a single story. My students quickly identified that the adults (especially those who did not know them and love them) would tell a much different, much less accurate, story about who fifth graders were.

In this same way, I suggested, when stories are told ABOUT groups of people, especially groups of people who have traditionally been denied power in our society, those stories tend to be overly simplistic, inaccurate and often negative.

One of the easiest ways that we can push beyond the single story is to seek out stories told BY people who are part of the group of people that you are trying to learn about. I brought up the Own Voices movement and the push to find writers who can write about their own lives and experiences instead of relying on white authors to do that work.

And then, I wanted to help my students to see this idea in real life. So, I shared a collection of Tweets that I had gathered, that used the #NotYourNativeStereotype hashtag in order to share stories and images of Native Americans telling their own stories in order to prove that they were not a stereotype. I scrolled through the collection I had created and again, I asked my students to use the second page of THIS FORM in order to write down what they were seeing.

As they started to share what they noticed, I realized how quickly they were forming new understandings of Native American people simply by looking at images shared from Native American people themselves. As they spoke of what they noticed, I could almost hear the “us” and “them” beginning to fade away. Instead, we began to speak about humans. Humans with a culture. Humans with a presence in today’s world. Humans with something to teach my students.

After looking at those Tweets, we added in another resource. We then watched THIS short video from Teen Vogue that has Native American girls sharing the truth about common misconceptions about Native Americans. Again, after watching, I asked the students to capture, in writing, what they were now able to see that they had missed before.

Again, we shared our thinking and, again, I was in awe of how thoughtful my students were being as we did this work.

After walking through this whole process as we thought about a group of people, I wanted to walk through the process again, but this time using a place.

Several weeks ago, I saw a post about a book called A Beautiful Ghetto. The book was a collection of photographs taken by Devin Allen, a photographer who became well-known for the pictures he took during the protests in Baltimore after the murder of Freddie Gray.  As soon as I was able to glimpse the images, I knew this was a book that I needed to share with my students. When the book arrived, I sat in awe of the images and spent a full hour by myself looking at the pictures. Not all of the pictures were ones that my students would be ready to discuss, but I knew that these photographs and the story of the man who took them would push our thinking around the idea of the danger of a single story.

I began by sharing a bit of the story of Devin Allen. I shared that he grew up in Baltimore and that when the city was protesting the death of Freddie Gray, he realized that the city he knew and loved was being shown in a way that did not match what he, himself, knew about Baltimore. So he started taking pictures. He wanted to show that there was more to the protests than what was being shown in the media and he also wanted to show that there was more to Baltimore than what most people understood. So, his book, A Beautiful Ghetto was his way of telling his own story and the story of the place he called home.

I began by sharing the page where Devin Allen explains his own understanding of the term “ghetto” and “uprising.”

Then, I gathered my students close and shared with them some photographs of Baltimore than might reinforce or match the single story that many of us carry of areas that are considered to be the ghetto. For my students, we also talked about the south side of Chicago and the single story many of us in the northwest suburbs of Chicago carry of the south side.

As I showed these images to my students, we again returned to THIS FORM, in order to write down what we noticed and thought about the single story often told about Baltimore. Here are some of the images we looked at:

I asked the students to share what the noticed and we talked about how we often think about “bad” areas of a city and we don’t usually think about the people, but rather the things that are run down and abandoned. We carry these single stories with us because those are the stories that we have been told. And, those are the ONLY stories that we have been told. I made sure to point out that Devin Allen did choose to include these images because they are INDEED a part of Baltimore and he wanted his readers to know that. But they are not the ONLY parts of Baltimore.

So after this discussion, we looked at a few more of Devin Allen’s photographs and we wrote down what else we noticed and what new understandings we reached. Here are some of the photographs that we looked at:

And as we began our discussion, I was amazed at the understandings that we were reaching. We started to talk about how THESE images exist in the SAME SPACE as the images that we first looked at. These images are not somewhere else, not in a different area, they both exist together. The difference comes in what Devin Allen chose to photograph. Where we choose to point the camera, when we choose to take the picture, what lens we are looking through, all of that matters in how others view a story.

We started to talk about how those we entered into a place like Baltimore, just to take pictures for others to see, they might choose to take pictures of the most shocking and disturbing images because that is what they saw and thought others would be drawn to look at. But when a photographer is truly FROM a place, when the place being photographed is his home, then he understands that there is more to reveal to the audience. Then he knows the joy of a place, then he knows the places and the people that make that place a home for others and then he can choose to take pictures of that other side of a place.

These decisions, they matter. They affect how we, the audience, comes to know and understand a place, or even a group of people. Again, we came back to the importance of own voices and the importance of seeking our the kinds of resources that can push us beyond the single story we are often told.

This conversation was probably one of our most powerful. I was in awe of my students and I was left so hopeful for this world. It was one of those moments when I felt so lucky to be a teacher, when I felt so lucky to be able to do this work.

After walking through this whole process twice, of pushing beyond the single story told to us, first of an entire group of people and second of a place, I knew it was time to release this work to my students. Their work would be what I would collect as evidence of how they were able to notice single stories, ask questions to move us beyond those single stories and use additional resources in order to understand multiple perspectives on a group of people or a place.

As I mentioned in my last blog post, our inquiry at this point in the year, remains guided. I am teaching them the process through which to walk when looking into something more closely. At this point, I am still providing them with resources. As we move through the year, we will work to learn how to gather resources ourselves, but at this point, I want to keep our work moving along by focusing on learning well FROM those resources.

So I asked my students to use THIS DOCUMENT WITH GATHERED RESOURCES in order to think about the single story of a group of people or a place. They were asked to look at each of the resources and then select one group of people or place that they would like to think more about. The first resources were those that I thought might reinforce or point out the single story that is often told about groups of people or places. On the first day, I asked them to use THIS FORM again in order to write down what they noticed and what they thought about the single story told about this group of people. They were then asked to write down questions that might help them move beyond these single stories.

The next day, I shared THIS DOCUMENT WITH ADDITIONAL RESOURCES and asked students to return to the group of people or place that they thought about yesterday. Today, they would be looking at resources that I believed would push them to think beyond the single stories they saw yesterday. Again, this would be evidence of how they were able to deepen their thinking and understanding as they looked at a variety of resources.

As the students worked, I was able to go around and confer and also celebrate how our thinking had deepened. It is not that we are in a perfect place of understanding, but we have come so far from where we started. These are skills that we will continue to build on, but this work has done such wonders for my heart and for my sense of hope.

I remain amazed at what is possible when you help children to look at the world in a different way. Several times throughout this work, my students asked me why I was considering this work part of our reading work. My response was simple. Reading is how we take in information and when we take in information without thinking carefully and critically about it, we end up understanding the world in a less accurate way. To be better readers of this world, we need to think about the information we are taking in, through words, through images, through the media that surrounds us. When we are more aware of the messages we are receiving, then we have more power over them. And that is THE most important kind of reading work that I can think of.